 |
No items matching your keywords were found.
Graffiti Legalized
legalise more walls for graffiti?
do you agree that if they legalised more walls for graffiti artists, it would help solve the problem or would encourage more vandalism?
This question is one of those questions that is akin to asking, "Does capital punishment deter or prevent heinous crimes." or "Is abortion okay?" I personally think that graffiti, as an art form, has it's place. But by the same token, I'm also against the use of toxic paints or aerosol propellants that are damaging to the environment. If someone takes it upon himself to deface or alter private property without the consent of the owner, then of course I am against it. However, if graffiti artists use abandoned buildings or any structures that are obviously in decay, especially those visible to the public on which to create their works, then it's okey-dokey, as far as I'm concerned. If the paint were semi-permanent (washes off relatively easily), then other places could be utilized as "supports" and maybe even the appearances of those places could be improved upon, in as much as the appearance of the property beforehand was sad and boring.
|
No items matching your keywords were found.
| Account limit of 2098 requests per hour exceeded. |
Graffiti Legal Advice
A few random Qs.....?
1- Are people on this site more open minded or less open minded about listening to new/different music than your actual friends are?
2- What would be the outcome if graffiti was legalized?
3- For their third album, Wu Tang was supposed to drop a triple album. Instead, they dropped "The W" which was a disappointment to many. Would it have been better or worse if they did drop a triple album that was the same quality as "The W" with three times as many tracks?
1. It's pretty even.
2. It'd be everywhere lol
3. Better
RSS Feeds
